The four Myers-Briggs axes are evaluated separately, because a chart method may predict one scale and miss another.
Which traditional chart signatures line up with each Myers-Briggs axis? Each scale has an established astrological correspondence that can be tested directly.
Mapped to the chartParticipants report their type when known and complete a short set of either-or questions, allowing each scale to be placed independently.
How type is capturedDoes the true birth chart perform better than plausible incorrect charts? This isolates whether correct birth data adds information beyond common patterns and base rates.
The comparisonsAnswer from your life as you remember it, not from what your chart or a previous reading says should be true.
Share your known Myers-Briggs type if you have one.
Answer three questions each about energy, information, decisions and structure.
Add context only when a forced choice misses something important about you.
The analysis becomes more precise as the sample grows. Every phase keeps the misses.
A first look at the signal once 400 charts are in. Early results, wide uncertainty, published openly.
The analysis runs again at 2,500 charts, with tighter estimates and checks on what survived Phase 1.
The complete analysis at 5,000 charts, including what worked, what failed and what remains uncertain.
Blind first. The chart is calculated and its type predictions are recorded before anyone reads the participant’s answers.
Type is measured, not assumed. Even when participants know their four letters, the same either-or battery places everyone on each scale.
Misses published. The findings include where these proposed signatures fail.
Read the full methodology →You will sign in by email, enter your birth details once, and use the same profile for any other study you choose.
